Process evaluation of the Performance-Based Bonus scheme / Jose Ramon G. Albert [and six others].
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- 1908-3297
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
University Library Filipiniana | Circulating | HD 4928 B62 P6 A43 2021 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 3UPML00039070 |
Browsing University Library shelves, Shelving location: Filipiniana, Collection: Circulating Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available |
![]() |
No cover image available | No cover image available |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
HD 1491 P5 C36 2021 Going against the grain : a case study of Jollibee Group Foundation's Farmer Entrepreneurship Program / | HD2087 C65 1998 Contract growing : intensifying TNC control in Philippine agriculture. | HD 2346 P6 F73 2019 Obstacles of Philippine SMEs' participation in global value chains / | HD 4928 B62 P6 A43 2021 Process evaluation of the Performance-Based Bonus scheme / | HD6181.85 I58 2005 Intensifying working women's burdens : the impact of globalization on women labor in Asia / | HD8730.Y58 V46 2006 Underground in Japan / | HD8730.Y58 V46 2006 Underground in Japan / |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 96-100)
Introduction -- Review of related literature -- Overview of the PBB scheme and its design -- PBB implementation -- Conclusion and policy recommendations
Since the adoption of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) scheme in 2012, its effectiveness,
particularly its impact on agencies’ reform efforts and public sector employees’ motivation
and productivity, has not been examined. The Department of Budget and Management
(DBM) deems it critical to study the effect of PBB on whole-of-government efforts to boost
productivity and push reforms, as well as government employees’ individual and team-level
motivations and productivity. DBM wishes to determine whether PBB is achieving its design
objectives and whether it is worth pursuing, given its budgetary implications. However, prior
to an impact evaluation, it is important to undertake a process evaluation, which could help
clarify whether and to what extent PBB has worked as planned. In this regard, this study
examines the extent to which the PBB design has been executed and identifies
implementation deficits, if any, particularly taking note of the bottlenecks and challenges
encountered by government agencies in meeting the conditions to qualify for PBB. It also
presents initial data on the possible effects of PBB on at least three levels: (a) agency-wide
incentive effects, (b) team-level collaboration effects, and (c) individual staff-member
incentive effects. This study finds mixed results on these three main channels of PBB impact.
It recommends a general review of the main policy objectives of this reform. It also identifies
several concrete reforms that could help sharpen PBB moving forward.
There are no comments on this title.