000			02339nam a22002173a 4500
001			UPMIN-00006645283
003			UPMIN
005			20230520165032.0
008			230520b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aupmin _cUPMin
041			_aeng
090		0	_aLG993.5 2012 _bA3 T37
100			_aTalo, Gellie A. _98581
245			_aValue chain of tomato in Bukidnon and Kapatagan : _bnet margins, market options, and price analysis / _c Gellie A. Talo
300			_a77 leaves
502			_aThesis, Undergraduate (BS Agribusiness Economics) -- U.P. Mindanao
520	3		_aThe study primarily compares the production and costs performances of the two leading tomato producing areas in Mindanao-Bukidnon and Kapatagan, Davao del Sur. It examines the profitability and the market channel choice of farmers across locations using net margins analysis. It also identifies the main actors in the tomato supply chain and its specific role played using value chain analysis. Descriptive analysis using the price determination principles were also employed in determining the contributing factors that impact in setting the prices of the commodity. Results showed that Kapatagan farmers were more efficient in production compared to Bukidnon, despite their small farm areas. Among the identified Kapatagan market channels, supplying to Kapatagan (Barrio) trading post was the most profitable. Meanwhile, CDO served as the only identified market channel in Bukidnon. On the other hand, retailers in Bankerohan acquired the highest margins among the other node. However, the differences in the period of harvesting and marketing of products could affect the variability and non uniformity of the costs and profitability distribution of the respondents. Thus, it is suggested to identify the specific period of activities to come up a coherent comparison. The contributing factors that affect the pricing of tomato beyond supply and demand are: (1) fruit classification and buyers' requirements; (2) season; (3) distance, communication facilities and market information; (4) infrastructure facilities; (5) market structure and other factors. Among the actors in the chain, wholesalers appeared to be the most influential in setting the prices while farmers are found to be as price takers.
905			_aFI
905			_aUP
942			_2lcc _cTHESIS
999			_c2877 _d2877