000			03549nam a22003257a 4500
003			UPMIN
005			20230721140420.0
008			230705b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a1908-3297
040			_cUPMIN
090			_aHD 4928 B62 P6 _bA43 2021
100			_aAlbert, Jose Ramon G. _eauthor. _923066
245			_a Process evaluation of the Performance-Based Bonus scheme / _cJose Ramon G. Albert [and six others].
300			_axi, 105 pages _b illustrations _c23 cm
490			_aResearch paper series _vno. 2021-03
504			_a Includes bibliographical references (pages 96-100)
505			_aIntroduction -- Review of related literature -- Overview of the PBB scheme and its design -- PBB implementation -- Conclusion and policy recommendations
520	3		_aSince the adoption of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) scheme in 2012, its effectiveness, particularly its impact on agencies’ reform efforts and public sector employees’ motivation and productivity, has not been examined. The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) deems it critical to study the effect of PBB on whole-of-government efforts to boost productivity and push reforms, as well as government employees’ individual and team-level motivations and productivity. DBM wishes to determine whether PBB is achieving its design objectives and whether it is worth pursuing, given its budgetary implications. However, prior to an impact evaluation, it is important to undertake a process evaluation, which could help clarify whether and to what extent PBB has worked as planned. In this regard, this study examines the extent to which the PBB design has been executed and identifies implementation deficits, if any, particularly taking note of the bottlenecks and challenges encountered by government agencies in meeting the conditions to qualify for PBB. It also presents initial data on the possible effects of PBB on at least three levels: (a) agency-wide incentive effects, (b) team-level collaboration effects, and (c) individual staff-member incentive effects. This study finds mixed results on these three main channels of PBB impact. It recommends a general review of the main policy objectives of this reform. It also identifies several concrete reforms that could help sharpen PBB moving forward.
650			_aBonuses (Employee fringe benefits) _xEvaluation. _z Philippines. _923067
650			_aEmployee fringe benefits _xEvaluation. _z Philippines. _923068
700			_aMendoza, Ronald U. _eauthor. _923069
700			_a Cuenca, Janet S. _e author. _923070
700			_aOpiniano, Gina A. _e author. _923071
700			_aMonje, Jennifer D. _eauthor. _923059
700			_aPastor, Michael A. _e author. _923072
700			_aMunoz, Mika S. _e author. _923073
856			_uhttps://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/research-paper-series/process-evaluation-of-the-performance-based-bonus-scheme
905			_aFi
942			_2lcc _cBKS _n0
999			_c20098 _d20098